Colombia's ambassador to the OAS walked out of an NGO presentation on human rights at an Inter-American Commission on Human Rights hearing on Thursday, because he "had not been informed of the content of the presentation."
Before his withdrawal, Colombian Ambassador to the OAS, Luis Alfonso Hoyos, read a statement to the IACHR (an autonomous organ of the Organization of American States). Hoyos told the Commission that Colombia had requested information on the content of the presentations on various occassions but had not received any.
Hoyos said that the petitioners had violated the rules of the IACHR and that Colombia was therefore unprepared and unable to respond to their arguements.
Among the topics covered by the NGO presentation were the illegal wire-tappings carried out by intelligence agency DAS, alleged State crimes committed by the army and police, gay rights and the situation of Colombia's war refugees.
Viviana Krsticevic, one of the petitioners from the Center for International Justice and Law (CEJIL) told El Tiempo she was "surprised and concerned" by the governments attitude.
"The government is pretending to not have information that it does have. If arguments have not been presented it's because the revelations [such as DAS espionage] only became known this year," Krsticevic said.
Andrewmann552
said:
 |
... Notice how TomTom and Bluebird are always abscent for these articles showing the dark side of Uribismo. |
gringomedeliin
said:
|
... The purpose of these hearing is for both sides to have information so they can address them at the meeting. If arguments have not been presented it's because the revelations [such as DAS espionage] only became known this year," Krsticevic said this sounds like this was added and the Government was not informed, Also is sounds like the wiretapping was being presented in violation of IACHR on rules, something that is part of an on going investigation can not be presented , a case can not be presented until all has been exhausted at the State level, There are three clear requirements that must be meet. It sound s more like an ambush attempt by some NGO's the IACHR should be ashamed to have allowed something like this to happen, tit makes the organization meaningless when it fails to follow it's own rules. It now opens the door for the State to reject the cases presented thus blocking the IACHR from taking any further actions on these cases per IACHR rules. |
